![]() |
By
Michael Godfrey Bell, 2010 |
|
Read Agent Human on-line, FREE Download a zipped file of Agent Human, FREE For further information, contact mgbell@agenthuman.com |
Groups of adjacent, genetically identical chimpanzees living in the Taï National Forest in western Africa use different techniques to hammer open the coula nuts which are a staple of their diet. Lydia Luncz of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, writing in Current Biology, describes how the different groups have well established methods for nut-cracking which persist over generations, even though the groups intermix, particularly through the exchange of female members, who adopt the methods of a new group and abandon the method they had previously used. Coula nuts are hard to crack early in the season, but become softer later on; all groups use small rocks to crack the nuts early in the season (of different sizes in the varying groups, but of a constant size within a group) while some groups switch to wooden 'hammers' later in the season, which are easier to find and use than the rocks but only work with softer nuts. "We have documented differences in hammer choice within a single forest block, with members of three different adjacent chimpanzee communities that are in regular contact with one another and are thus not genetically differentiated," says Luncz. Continued below Read previous consciousness blogs: Talking to yourself is not crazy, 30 November 2009 The future of human evolution, 05 December 2009 Testosterone, 15 December 2009 Self, 03 January 2010 Elders,
11 January 2010 Attention, 20 March 2010 Emotions, 01 May 2010 Face 16 May 2010 Trust 25 July 2010 Yawning
19 September 2010 Sleep
18 December 2010 Dancing
13 November 2011 |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
There are numerous messages here testifying to the usefulness of groups in evolutionary terms. The emergence of copying within a group is one of the most obvious. Copying could take place within a heterogeneous population, but is less likely to be effective without the social pressure to conform that goes along with group membership. That situation is particularly marked when an out-group female joins the group and immediately changes her technique, as the researchers observed. The facts in this case also demonstrate the evolution of evolution as a mechanism. As between two undifferentiated populations which are in competition with each other, the most successful one will be the one which develops evolutionary mechanisms leading to more effective performance. The emergence of cognitive traits supporting 'groupedness' (whether cultural or biological) is therefore inevitable in the winning population, alongside other competitive weapons. This leads to a suggestion that groups will develop in all life forms which have the level of cognitive abilities required to support it; in fact the two go hand in hand. Although some species are labeled 'social', this creates a false distinction: in reality all advanced species do display and utilize 'groupedness' in one form or another. Read more in Chapter Two of Agent Human by Michael Bell, The Evolution of Social Consciousness in Animals.
|
|